Discussion

Who should never have had a role in BH 90210

Who should never have had a role in BH 90210
Donna
David
Kelly
Dylan
Steve
Displaying 1-10 out of 14 Posts
Tara |

Member since Nov 2007

donna is probably the worst actress in the history of time. hense why she went no where after 90210.
Sylvie |

Member since Feb 2008

I can't imagine the show without any of these characters.
John |

Member since Jan 2008

why is andrea not on this list? or cindy walsh?
Tiffany |

Member since Jun 2008

I can't belive Brenda was not on this!!! I think the show could have been SO MUCH BETTER WITHOUT HER!! I mean the show was at it's highest points when she left!!! I can't imagen the show without anyone, but Brenda, Noah, Dylan, and Matt. I think they should have never been on it at all!
Chloé |

Member since Oct 2007

ur a hater tiffany! lol
Chloé |

Member since Oct 2007

i agree with Sylvie...

as a TRUE diehard fan...i know in my heart that the show had to have had alllll the original cast members because they each brought something special & unique that helped build 90210 for what it was...ESPeciallllly, BRENDA! Even Tori Spelling said, and I quote "Brenda was 90210" enough said. stop hating. :)
Debbie |

Member since Oct 2007

The worst of the lot had to be Samantha Sanders, as wooden as Blackpool North Pier
Jamie |

Member since Sep 2007

Dude... Donna was the best. From her lamo one line an episode comments in season 1 to Donna Martin Graduate to the Donna we all love today, Tori Spelling rocked that character. Plus I'm a bit Tori supporter. Anyone who can bag themselves out ala Scream 2 and So NoTORIous is a okay in my books.
**GiNA** |

Member since Sep 2008

i love your quote!! :) Brenda is, was, and will always be the queen of Beverly Hills...and Kelly will always be playing catch up looking like a dumb easy blonde...people hate on Shannon Doherty but if it wasn't for her noone would have even watched the new series.
Chloé |

Member since Oct 2007

exactly Gina!!!
©2009 Watercooler Inc.